Inconsistency Management and Prioritized Syntax-Based Entailment

نویسندگان

  • Salem Benferhat
  • Claudette Cayrol
  • Didier Dubois
  • Jérôme Lang
  • Henri Prade
چکیده

The idea of ordering plays a basic role in commonsense reasoning for addressing three interrelated tasks: inconsistency handling, belief revision and plausible inference. We study the behavior of non-monotonic inferences induced by various methods for priority-based handling of inconsistent sets of classical formulas. One of them is based on a lexicographic ordering of maximal consistent subsets, and refines Brewka's preferred sub-theories. This new approach leads to a non-monotonic inference which satisfies the "rationality" property while solving the problem of blocking of property inheritance. It differs from and improves previous equivalent approaches such as Gardenfors and Makinson's expectation-based inference, Pearl's System Z and possibilistic logic.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

An Argumentation Framework for Merging Conflicting Knowledge Bases: The Prioritized Case

An important problem in the management of knowledge-based systems is the handling of inconsistency. Inconsistency may appear because the knowledge may come from different sources of information. To solve this problem, two kinds of approaches have been proposed. The first category merges the different bases into a unique base, and the second category of approaches, such as argumentation, accepts...

متن کامل

Inconsistency Measurement based on Variables in Minimal Unsatisfiable Subsets

Measuring inconsistency degrees of knowledge bases (KBs) provides important context information for facilitating inconsistency handling. Several semantic and syntax based measures have been proposed separately. In this paper, we propose a new way to define inconsistency measurements by combining semantic and syntax based approaches. It is based on counting the variables of minimal unsatisfiable...

متن کامل

On the Complexity of Non-monotonic Entailment in Syntax-based Approaches

The purpose of this paper is to outline various results regarding the computational complexity of non-monotonic entailment in diierent syntax-based approaches. Starting from a (non necessarily consistent) belief base E and a pre-ordering on E, we rst remind diierent mechanisms for selecting preferred consistent subsets in syntax-based approaches. Then we present diierent entailment principles i...

متن کامل

Heuristic Approach to Manage Semantic Heterogeneity and Data Inconsistency in Enterprise Data Integration

XML syntax and semantic validations are critical to the correct service transaction specification and service integration based on existing distributed and heterogeneous computing services. Current industry practice of XSLT-based Schematron validation may produce invalid results, and contributes a reusable XML validator component that supports sound integrated syntax/semantic validations and ev...

متن کامل

What Syntax Can Contribute in the Entailment Task

We describe our submission to the PASCAL Recognizing Textual Entailment Challenge, which attempts to isolate the set of Text-Hypothesis pairs whose categorization can be accurately predicted based solely on syntactic cues. Two human annotators examined each pair, showing that a surprisingly large proportion of the data – 34% of the test items – can be handled with syntax alone, while adding inf...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 1993